Some people believe that everyone should be free to make their own lifestyle choices, even if those choices are unhealthy. Other people think that the government should intervene to influence people’s choices, for example by putting high taxes on unhealthy products.
Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion.
As an independent civilian, a person should be free to do whatever he/she wants until it is legal and not hurting others. Although, people believe in the government's intervention to maintain a healthy society, wouldn't it be proven unsatisfactory for some people? This essay discusses both the free life of the community as well as government's intervention about unhealthy products followed by my own perspectives.
An independent country itself means freedom of citizens to make their own lifestyle choices irrespective of health. According to the law and legislation of any free country, people might have their own different interests and choices. For example, people may eat street food or have an addiction to alcohol or cigarettes for their own satisfaction and enjoyment. They will themselves be the victim of the after-effects of whatever activities they are doing and it won't harm other people at all.
However, the working government can decide about the safety of people by doing the sanity check all the available products through a certain process such as ISI and FSSAI - An international organization to do the health-check of a product. Also, it may impose a heavy tax on unhealthy products to prevent their consumptions. This would promote only healthy food in the market and may improve overall public health in the long term. But, this certification process may have certain loop wholes and it cannot cover all the products ideally. Also, it can be biased as it would be done by a person at last. Moreover, it may be proven unsatisfactory for people who prefer unhygienic food and alcohol.
In conclusion, according to me, although unhealthy products may be prevented and overall health can be improved by putting high tax, it would be proven unsatisfactory for some people having all rights of independent civilians. Also, the screening process itself cannot be implemented ideally and might be proven biased. Therefore, people should be free to consume anything irrespective of the product's quality.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...others. Although, people believe in the governments intervention to maintain a healthy soci...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 211, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...rvention to maintain a healthy society, wouldnt it be proven unsatisfactory for some pe...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 222, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
... maintain a healthy society, wouldnt it be proven unsatisfactory for some people? ...
^^
Line 1, column 321, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...ses both the free life of the community as well as governments intervention about unhealth...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 697, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...who prefer unhygienic food and alcohol. In conclusion, according to me, although...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1706.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24923076923 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02188188188 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526153846154 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0312393924 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.625 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3125 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308271389762 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10698574152 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0755997683612 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206416703115 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660759957801 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.