Some people believe that international sporting events are the ideal opportunity to show the world the qualities of the hosting nation. Others believe that these events are mainly a large unjustifiable expense. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
International athletic events have had both positive as well as negative impacts on the countries hosting those events. They allow the hosting nations to showcase their financial capabilities, and also their unique cultural aspects. However, it is now a long-debated issue among the people whether their positives outweigh the negatives. In my opinion, intercontinental sporting events can have a double-edged impact. If executed efficiently, these events can generate great economic as well as regional benefits, otherwise, the loss would be huge.
It is undeniable fact that international sporting events such as Olympics, Football world cup etc. bring a plethora of benefits to the hosting nation. To begin with, economic uplift is the most obvious outcome of a well-planned sporting event. This, however, is possible, only if the event in itself is implemented successfully. Otherwise, it may take a nation towards yet another economic crisis. Greece, for instance, had injected a significant proportion of their public investment fund into building infrastructure to host Olympics. This had led to depletion of government’s funds which ultimately resulted in severe inflation and economic crisis.
What is more, hosting an event at an international stage is also an opportunity to showcase the hospitality and positive cultural aspects to the whole world. Artists such as singers and actors get a chance to perform during the event, this will lead to their global recognition. Finally, hosting an event at home encourages and gives a better opportunity to the younger fellow sportsmen to participate and compete in the event with the support of their home crowd. This will definitely lead to better performance by the hosting players. Russia, for example, has recently outplayed several better-ranked teams in the world cup 2019 and for the very first time in the history, has reached the Quarterfinal. This, I believe, was only possible with the support from the local crowd.
From the above discussion, it can be concluded that, although hosting international sports activities are beneficial both economically as well as culturally. However, the planning and the implementation must be as prudent as possible in order to avoid any financial losses and country’s defamation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... athletic events have had both positive as well as negative impacts on the countries hosti...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 658, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n severe inflation and economic crisis. What is more, hosting an event at an int...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 136, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...vities are beneficial both economically as well as culturally. However, the planning and t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, may, so, well, for example, for instance, such as, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1950.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52407932011 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1686157092 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583569405099 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 612.9 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.0589447988 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.65 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206925382713 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630607238737 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467211429942 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11957150148 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407581904848 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.