Globalization has abated the cultural barriers between countries and it enforced everyone to assimilate host nation culture. Having said this, a new argument has come to the forefront where certain people assert that the best way to inculcate others cultural style is either by watching cinemas or video recordings, however; rest contend that it is preferable to go through compendia or dailies. While I opine that both viewpoints will significantly enhance the learning skills. This essay will unfold both the perspectives prior to rendering a plausible conviction.
First and foremost, visual means of learning is proven to be the best way for grasping knowledge. This means that people are predisposed to motion pictures since longtime and also they depict every detail legitimately which enables to comprehend expeditiously. A survey run by Cambridge University, for example, in 2006 had revealed that people who are subjected to continuous exposure to video content was learned 89% of the delivered subject. Furthermore, cultural practices include mannerisms, wearable items, languages to name a few. In order to rapidly understand all these, the visual content is the first medium of choice. Also, to master linguists of the different culture it is essential to watch multi-cultural and multi-linguistic films.
On the contrary, despite videos play a crucial role in teaching different cultures rapidly, I believe books and newspapers are also equally vital. Since the dawn of civilization, enormous sources of bibliographies are accessible to mankind, and they will provide an opportunity to get exposure to various cultural works of literature. This eventually, gives detailed know-how of various realms. What is more, various eminent columnists of magazines and newspapers frequently publish comprehensive information on cultural understandings which are produced by extensive research. Referring those will greatly indoctrinate yourself and can gain expertise in that particular aspect.
In summation, I reiterate that there are valid justifications for both assertions, hence, I subscribe to both the theories owing to the fact that either visual means or bibliographies, both will have a similar effect in the assimilation of cultural knowledge.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 396, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ble to go through compendia or dailies. While I opine that both viewpoints will signi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, while, for example, on the contrary, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1927.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68436578171 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18422880669 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628318584071 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.6072138858 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.4375 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1875 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1875 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142210333008 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0395219546471 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0335366332571 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0740761686572 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343549028005 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.69 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 78.4519038076 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.