It is an irrefutable fact that contemporary telecommunications have over exceeded the predictions of common masses since the medieval period and its wide range of applications across the globe is effective and efficient. However, it is often argued by the majority of people that there are some detrimental consequences on social connectedness. Despite having few hurdles associated with communication technologies, I assert that benefits outweigh due to its extensive advantages offer to mankind. This essay will unfold both the views prior to drawing and plausible conclusion.
To embark with, there are some reasons for this dire repercussions due to social intercourse. First and foremost, it significantly hinders the face-to-face interactions among people, especially students of secondary and tertiary education are victimized profoundly. By this, I mean that these days large section of society owns a mobile phone and they are vividly relying on social texting applications instead of verbal communication. Eventually, it has been undermining their communication skills, overall. Additionally, many people are divorcing after marriage knowing the fact that either of the partners was in an intimate relationship with multiple persons online. Consequently, jeopardizing their children life.
On the flip side, the proliferation of cutting-edge technologies in the communication erasing barriers between countries and sustaining the world a global village. For instance, people in olden days bound to walk miles to communicate, gone are those days, mankind is able to interact virtually at push of a button. Furthermore, telecommunications has revolutionized the medium of interaction among communities, groups, non-profit organizations, and unknown citizens. In other words, people who intent to socialize or organize a protest against the government or indulge in charity programs can mobilize in no time. Not to mention, people can share a vast amount of resources and can use this technology as a medium for interpersonal development.
To sum up, although having a couple of setbacks like lack of one to one interactions and indulging in unwanted post-marital relationships, I believe that revolutionary telecommunications are utmost imperative in eliminating subtle obstacles between cross-border communications as well as aiding in mobilizing, by building stronger alliances among each other. Given this situation, it is recommended that people should make use of state-of-the-art technologies productively in architecting associations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 69, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one interaction', 'an interaction', or simply 'interactions'?
Suggestion: one interaction; an interaction; interactions
... couple of setbacks like lack of one to one interactions and indulging in unwanted post-marital ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, well, for instance, i mean, as well as, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2190.0 1615.20841683 136% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.93495934959 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.6397712058 2.80592935109 130% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653116531165 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 701.1 506.74238477 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.5390069536 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.823529412 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7058823529 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58823529412 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190714606636 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501710089955 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0354937099936 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103772139898 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0144143247579 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.11 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.54 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 78.4519038076 175% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.