It is an undeniable fact that the majority of people are over-relying on technology for their day to day chores. It is often seen that many people, of course, using the internet to familiarize with the health complications they possess instead of consulting with the doctor. This trend of over-dependence on medical websites and artificial intelligence based applications is interlinked with several reasons. I agree with this idea to some extent, while I assert that there are more detrimental effects than positive outcomes owing to this. This essay will unfold both standpoints prior to endowing a conceivable persuasion.
To commence with, there are many grounds for peoples' predisposition towards technologies. Perhaps the main reason why people overwhelmingly reliant is because of a lack of trust in physicians. This means that medical professionals are prescribing unrelated tests and medicines which significantly increase their bottom line. As a result, those who merely run their lives on daily and monthly wages are suffering and it is becoming burdensome for them. In addition, the other potential belief why they intend to go online for medical suggestions is because websites are providing a precise piece of information related to onset, proliferation, and the root cause of disease. Moreover, they are displaying objective evidence of varied epidemic ailments.
On the other hand, advocates who are against the idea of attaining knowledge through internet resources are having valid assumptions. The primary argument supporting this notion is they are certified to do this job. In other words, health care professionals are way far better than vividly widespread unauthentic sources and they are trained to identify the illnesses and diagnose appropriately. Furthermore, during their academic course, they get extensive practical experience which is truly worthwhile to treat patients in the real world. Secondly, if people self-diagnose themselves there may be a potential danger of dire repercussions and some times lead to death. The best illustration of this is a study conducted by the United States Food and Drug Administration, the report depicts that 12% of deaths across the world is due to the overdose of medication as a result of self-treatment.
All summed up, it must be said that referencing readily available technologies to draw conclusions about their health has become prevalent these days. Although people are considering technologies to attain medical knowledge purporting to their morbidities and some times to get rid of ungenuine consultants, I believe this is a downtrend as we have experienced economical medical practitioners and besides self-diagnose is deleterious.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, while, in addition, of course, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2299.0 1615.20841683 142% => OK
No of words: 412.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58009708738 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24871092571 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 176.041082164 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606796116505 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 724.5 506.74238477 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6641616168 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6842105263 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.68421052632 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247331120292 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649405019395 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418685936108 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145029694675 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360293068832 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 78.4519038076 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.