The governments should allocate more funding to teaching sciences rather than other subjects in order for the country to develop and progress. To what extent do you agree with the statement?
It is argued that to anticipate advancement in the development of a country, governments ought to budget a significant amount of funds in educating science to its students instead of other subjects in the curriculum. From my perspective, I partially disagree with the statement and this essay will analyze and outline the arguments.
To commence with, assimilating science in the academics is pivotal for the esteemed foundation of oneself. In other words, applications of science can be seen every in the day to day life, learning these will definitely uplift the career of individuals as well the future generations. For instance, when we take a look at the number of eminent scientists, 90% of them are in the field of science and indubitably they have made our lives walk in the park. Furthermore, current cutting-edge technologies experiencing across the world is the result of governments futuristic view towards miracles of sciences. Apparently, this forecast has made wonders like the exploration of Mars, finding medication for HIV and predicting weather forecast precisely.
However, there are other fields apart of science which has gained popularity over the ages and proved on par with it. This is to say mathematics, athletics, linguistics, and so on have remained to be paramount and helping to crab enormous opportunities for the professionals in their respective non-science career fields. To exemplify this, the number of personnel registering for the non-science field across the globe is tremendously on the upsurge. Thus, these progressive statistics alongside other subjects overrule the arguments of proponents intriguing towards governments funding only sciences.
All summed up, I regurgitate that although sciences play a key role in shaping the future of the world, I believe that there are other popular fields which have equal importance which lead to the development of the country. Given this situation, governments bolster all the fields to develop economically.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 33, Rule ID: APART_A_PART[2]
Message: Wrong collocation. Did you mean 'apart from'?
Suggestion: apart from
...ely. However, there are other fields apart of science which has gained popularity ove...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, furthermore, however, if, look, so, thus, well, for instance, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46451612903 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16828718782 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593548387097 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0954114915 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.307692308 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8461538462 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217104761159 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758899312898 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429389080912 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134133683655 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370817086321 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.