It is an incontrovertible fact that travelers seeking to fly by airplane is increasing exponentially. Arguments supporting this propensity is upscaling among some individuals and they state that it should be continued limitlessly, however, rest is on an opinion that authorities ought to control their frequency. Despite having varied assumptions, I strongly believe that poignant policies should be operationalized to reduce the multitude of aircraft globally. This essay will unravel both arguments prior to rendering a plausible conviction.
To embark with, there are some reasons behind the people who incline to have the facility of limitless air travel. First of all, admittedly, it is the most convenient and comfortable way of traveling experience. By this, I mean that people can travel long distances, indeed they can reach other continents with negligible physical and mental strenuous effort. In addition to this, if a person wants to fly to another country due to any exigency, he can reach there, irrespective of the time and day of travel. Second of all, significant economic growth was witnessed by many nations, especially whi economy is merely dependent on tourism. This is to say enthusiastic people who always want to explore new places around that world have been relying on air travel, for them, many countries are liberating their policies and allowing their airspace agencies to expand their business by buying brand new jets, and ultimatley unfruling redcarpets for tourists.
On the other hand, proponents who subscribe to the theory that lawmakers should react against airliners against their vivid expansion, have countless rationales. one of the main justification is air traffic could lead to an increase in air pollution and subsequently result in depletion of the ozone layer. This could pose a serious threat to the ecosystem by allowing harm UV rays from the sun into the atmosphere of the earth. Furthermore, gases released by the airplanes accumulate around the earth and eventually raises the earth's temperature. This effect is well known as global warming and many environmentalists are crying and trying to reverse it to save our planet. Another vital reason for people urging administrators is abatement of fossil fuel reserves. According to the World Economic Forum, with this pace of using natural reserves, mankind will deplete them within 50 years by putting our future generations at stake. Hence, governments should bring enforcement to either limit their frequency of flights or use sustainable renewable energy resources as everybody has equal responsibility in protecting the future of our earth including authorities.
All summed up, I reiterate that although the airplane provides comfort and convenience, I assert that preserving the earth resources and stepping towards innovating alternative energies are overweighed in view of providing safe, efficient and superior future to our next generation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 163, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...d expansion, have countless rationales. one of the main justification is air traffi...
^^^
Line 5, column 529, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'earths'' or 'earth's'?
Suggestion: earths'; earth's
...und the earth and eventually raises the earths temperature. This effect is well known ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 284, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...superior future to our next generation.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, so, thus, well, i mean, in addition, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2505.0 1615.20841683 155% => OK
No of words: 456.0 315.596192385 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49342105263 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62105577807 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05702619622 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 288.0 176.041082164 164% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631578947368 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 780.3 506.74238477 154% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.9894549159 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.842105263 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.10526315789 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162657293564 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0424005849031 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386403071279 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0819705714857 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037975827009 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.37 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 160.0 78.4519038076 204% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.