Some people believe that manufactures should be responsible for reducing the large amount of packaging they use. Other say consumers should avoid buying heavily packaged items. discuss both views and state your opinion. And include examples from your experience.
Industrial revolution has expanded rapidly in the last decade and touched every corner of the planet by increasing demands. Makers have to claim accountability for excess wrapping materials. Many opine that customers need to go for minimum packed products.we will explore both of them in up coming passages.
The multinational companies and institutions have proven today that their greediness is endless. Hence to increase the profit and port-folio of the business,they often end up using needless packaging to impress more and more users. A study from California University show that two-billion trees are cuting down every year to make card-bord for just one e-commerce company only, is one of the instances. In addition , the council has stated that 40% solid west collected impacts on the environmental imbalance.
The collective efforts made by the mass over-turn the side effect, like wise educate them by seminars and presentations using different media to stay away from such products by population, hammering the companies economy and bring them to their knees and force to change their narrative.This impact, crunch the price by reducing the production cost, as a result it will be affordable in market. In 2005, fast food giant Mc Donalds had to change their packaging strategy of plastic bags to the paper by facing massive protest and anger by the communities is such an example of the people power.
In conclusion, Both consumer as well as makers are vital for the economical balance.i believe they have to be responsible in their act by simultaneously minimize boxing material usage, gives inexpensive item to the mass and precious gift to globe.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...today that their greediness is endless. Hence to increase the profit and port-folio o...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 157, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , they
...he profit and port-folio of the business,they often end up using needless packaging t...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 415, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ly, is one of the instances. In addition , the council has stated that 40% solid w...
^^
Line 5, column 204, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'companies'' or 'company's'?
Suggestion: companies'; company's
...h products by population, hammering the companies economy and bring them to their knees a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 288, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...ees and force to change their narrative.This impact, crunch the price by reducing th...
^^^^
Line 7, column 30, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... power. In conclusion, Both consumer as well as makers are vital for the economical bal...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 85, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...rs are vital for the economical balance.i believe they have to be responsible in ...
^
Line 7, column 249, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to the mass and precious gift to globe.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, so, well, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25842696629 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92691476284 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659176029963 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.3498768472 49.4020404114 185% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.4 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140209724994 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044480799479 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0346393673279 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0776952250418 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0274771637051 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.54 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.