Some people believe that the most effective way to tackle industrial pollution is to tax factories generating it. Others say there are alternatives to handle it. Discuss both sides and provide your opinion.
Environmental problems are most worrying people in these days. Some people think putting more tax on the industries which are generating much pollution can be an effective way to reduce environmental issues whereas, others think there are many other solutions to tackle it. I will discuss both sides and later state my opinion in the following passage.
Firstly, generating tax for the factories which are causing pollution is an effective idea to reduce pollution. By generating higher taxes on the industries the owners will be careful before disposing of contaminating products. Also, the authorities must instruct them about the pollution caused due to their factory wastage. So, that they will be thinking before using most affected products. At the same time, they will think a while for an alternative which cause less affect to environment. Secondly, generating higher tax will also lead to less salaries as the company cannot able to bear higher wages. Indirectly, the workers will be reduced which will also lead to unemployment.
Eventually, there are many more remedial solutions to reduce cause of pollution. First of all, before using more effective materials for production they must think twice and analyse how the process affect the environment. Another way is, let the companies get encouraged to use environmentally friendly products. For example, industries such as leathers and garments produced a large amount of chemical waste, which not only contaminates the air but also pollutes the water and soil.
After having considered all the above mentioned points, we can finally draw a conclusion that the most effective way to handle industrial pollution is to tax factories and others disagree. But, this would be affective as people will be aware of its causes and it leads to less profit to the owner.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 327, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[4]
Message: “So , that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...on caused due to their factory wastage. So, that they will be thinking before using most...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 423, Rule ID: VB_A_WHILE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'think awhile'?
Suggestion: think awhile
...d products. At the same time, they will think a while for an alternative which cause less aff...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 546, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun salaries is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...generating higher tax will also lead to less salaries as the company cannot able to ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, for example, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2866894198 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80507458542 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57337883959 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0761493456 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8125 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3125 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27399613996 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860091794871 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0834928051612 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194176579387 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120836546301 0.056905535591 212% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.