Some people believe that natural ability is necessary to be successful at sports. Others believe that hard work and practice is more important. Discuss both sides and add your own opinion.
Some players are born to be great while others make their name by the virtue of their hard work. Whether natural talent or good work ethics makes one a better sportsman is a much debated topic and this essay will discuss both sides of argument with a personal opinion at the end.
On the one hand, some renowned sport persons simply seem to have unbelievable inborn talent and great set of sporting skills. that is to say, they have a natural predisposition to the game in a way that no other players can match or emulate which makes them stand out from the crowd. For example, no matter how long an amateur cricketer dedicates himself to the nets, he can possibly only dream of playing like Brian Lara who appears to belong to a completely different league and can send the crowd in a state of frenzy with his mesmerizing stroke-play. Undoubtedly, child prodigies who keep at a game and turn it into a professional pursuit end up with greater achievements than others who might spend day in and out at practice in their career.
On the other hand, there are few select ones who deliver their promises by the dint of hardship and dedication. In fact, it is rare to see a player sustain the pressure of the competitive game without putting hard work and dedicating himself to the cause of the game. there are many sports persons who do not realise their full potential and are not able to deliver the expectations of their fans because of not taking practice sessions or the daily exercise regime seriously. Yuvraj Singh who is an Indian cricketer is a good example of unfulfilled promises.
Personally, I believe success at sports is a combination of both. Strong innate qualities and temperament for a sports when coupled with a strict discipline at the game can make a sportsman achieve remarkable feats and set a precedent for the next generation.
In conclusion, sportsperson who are charismatic make improbable things possible on the sports field while players even with little flair for the game can achieve higher success with stronger work ethics. However, a sportsman having both of these traits will be hard to beat and will have an illustrious career.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 252, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...l discuss both sides of argument with a personal opinion at the end. On the one hand, some re...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...elievable inborn talent and great set of sporting skills. that is to say, they ha...
^^
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: That
...lent and great set of sporting skills. that is to say, they have a natural predispo...
^^^^
Line 3, column 373, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'can'.
Suggestion: can
...keter dedicates himself to the nets, he can possibly only dream of playing like Brian Lara w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 269, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...ating himself to the cause of the game. there are many sports persons who do not real...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 111, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a sport' or simply 'sports'?
Suggestion: a sport; sports
...ng innate qualities and temperament for a sports when coupled with a strict discipline a...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1803.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 376.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79521276596 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64473386015 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563829787234 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.0171256612 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.785714286 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8571428571 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168012053095 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656771916987 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664584424329 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103729289367 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602433704242 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.