It is always argued whether the natural ability is more important to be a successful sportsman or hardworking? In this essay, we want to discuss both views.
On the one hand, inborn ability plays an important role to be successful in sports. Scientists figured out that, there is a direct link between Zhen and sport. Nowadays sports coaches try to distinguish children's abilities and inform families about it, to encourage them to move through their children's talents. A clear example of interdependence between Zhen and sports is Kenia's athletics who are always the best in running race genetically. So the ability is efficient in success.
On the other hand, effort and hardworking are vitally important and without them, nobody can be successful even with great ability. Also, there are lots of successful athletes who do not have special inborn talent but with extensive practice and effort, they gain success. For example, I have a colleague who did not have any significant ability in swimming but she loves it extremely much, So do practice every day and night for years, finally, she participated in swimming competitions and won a medal. There are lots of examples like this around us, which clear the hardworking role in success.
In Sum up, although the natural ability is important in success, training and effort are more crucial. In my point of view, everybody can achieve everything with hardworking.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, so, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1189.0 1615.20841683 74% => OK
No of words: 233.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10300429185 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80167124216 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605150214592 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 373.5 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.9649071293 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4615384615 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9230769231 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46153846154 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174807620667 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688440620703 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576351973219 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118483529767 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447289570294 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.