With the advent of technology, people have more options than the people who lived in the past. That's why many people think that nowadays people have too many options to choose. I am fully agree with this statement because we face lots of options almost on every field.
In the past, there were ony few channels to watch tv films or series, but now people have many facilities to reach endless tv films or series through services like Netflix, Tv+. The problem is to choose options from this endless sources. It is like a multi criteria decision system for people. Like I mentioned, nowadays people have many options almost on every field. For example, when people want to reserve hotel rooms via internet, they just give the necessary informations to source (service supplier) like how many rooms they need, the money they can pay at most and at least, the place where they want to stay and what facilities the hotel service supply. Even though the outputs are restricted by our criteras that we give to services, at the end, we still have many options and we choose the most logical ones among these options.
In the past, there were not sufficient schools and universities for students to take education and only big cities had universities. But nowadaty, almost every cities have their own universities and the amount of universities have exponentially increased especially in big cities. After students graduate from their high schhols, they can choose their universities amoung many options.
In conclusion, people living today have many opportunies than the people lived in the past. The only problem is to decide decisions from this endless options. The important thing is that more options, more chances.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
... than the people who lived in the past. Thats why many people think that nowadays peo...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 189, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
... too many options to choose. I am fully agree with this statement because we face lot...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng is that more options, more chances.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, still, at least, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45468837706 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536585365854 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.6839975646 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6666666667 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.46666666667 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235114653756 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847996078572 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753289812128 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148852988576 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0854994452816 0.056905535591 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.