The maps illustrate the existing layout of university's sports centre and how it will be look like after redevelopment. From the maps given, it is conspicuous that all facilities will be located in one place after redevelopment and with the new added facilities, university's sports centre will be modern and more effective.
Existing sports centre has a 25 meter swimming pool behind the reception. On the east wing, there is a seating room and on the west ring, there is a changing room. Gym is located at the rear side of swimming pool and outdooor courts are located outside of the main building on both side.
By doing development to existing sports center, a leisure pool is expected to be erected on the west side. All the facilities supplied by sports center are planned to gather in one place. The 25 meter swimming pool will remain at the same place behind reception where sports shop and cafe is expected be erected. On the other hand, dance studios is expected to be built on the east side of building and two additional changing rooms is expected to be constructed on both front side corners of the building. Gym is expected to be at the same location after redevelopment and sports hall is expected to be erected adjacent to the seating place.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'maps'' or 'map's'?
Suggestion: maps'; map's
...look like after redevelopment. From the maps given, it is conspicuous that all facil...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 7.0 300% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1042.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73636363636 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65278584271 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463636363636 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5263771596 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.2 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.3 5.23603664747 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149089925125 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0767832817069 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0931915204093 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120333543967 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0927008548085 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.