The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010

The bar chart illustrates the proportion of Australian people in specific age groups who did regular physical activity in the given year, 2010. From the data supplied, it is conspicuous that almost every female age groups did more regular physical activity than male age groups.

Regarding to male's proportion, the peak percentage occurred at the 15 to 24 age group and the proportion was 52.8%. After that period, the percentage showed downward trend till the 45 to 54 age group, acquiring 39.5%. However, later on, a gradual rise occurred at every ten years and increasing proportion amount at every ten years was approximately 2%.. Latly, the proportion reached 46.7% that was only 4% less than the male's peak age group.

Regarding to female's proportion, the percentage showed upward trend till the 55 to 64 age group. Within these age groups, the percentage reached from 47.7% to 53.3% that was the peak percentage. After that period, the percentage showed decreasing and the final percentage was about 47.1%. Male and female proportion was very near at 65 and over age group.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ercentage showed downward trend till the 45 to 54 age group, acquiring 39.5%. How...
^^
Line 3, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...p, acquiring 39.5%. However, later on, a gradual rise occurred at every ten years...
^^
Line 3, column 355, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
... at every ten years was approximately 2%.. Latly, the proportion reached 46.7% tha...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 908.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07262569832 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61373716818 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536312849162 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.3942300579 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.8 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.2 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328946222017 0.215688989381 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150784750711 0.103423049105 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126030673932 0.0843802449381 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255294188255 0.15604864568 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.145501637563 0.0819641961636 178% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.