Some people believe online material should be used by a child to learn whereas others think only printed media should be used. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
With the advent of technology these days, there has been a diversion in studying pattern. It is perceived by some that internet plays a significance role in providing impactful data to study in comparison with standard print media, and because of this, it should be followed. Whereas, other opine that it is better to go with the original printed physical books. In my opinion, the latter one is more fruitful in nature for the reason that authenticity plays a vital role in determining correct facts, and the old school way of doing things is the perfect option to achieve that.
To begin with, admittedly, digital media has changed children’s way to gain knowledge. They are blessed with meaningful and umpteen material, which is available on internet at almost no cost. And the best thing about following this practice is that it keeps them updated with current trends. This not only helps in gaining insight with wider perspective, but also enhances the productivity, as well as capabilities of individuals. Moreover, the methodology these online platforms use to teach is tremendous in nature. One such example of this is BYJU’s, the learning app. They have come up with a mobile application in which they are providing study materials using entertaining videos and pictures. The reason their popularity is at an all time high is that they have made studying enjoyable.
Coming to the traditional way of learning things, those who prefer this method, believe that reliability and truthfulness are the key to success, two vital aspects to make something trustworthy. Companies and people producing the hard copy of text books are aware of the fact that they can’t make any mistake. For this reason, they are bound to be correct and responsible for the content they print. Additionally, they are known to be truthful in nature as there have been many instances of fake and incorrect material available online, whereas, there has been no such instance in general school study material. To exemplify, there was an experiment conducted by Delhi Public School in its last session for 10th standard wherein they asked students to come up with solutions for an assignment without using their original books. Most of the students got them wrong because of the incorrect information available on internet.
To conclude, those who are of the notion that online materials are better, are of the belief that it provides them with quality data and plethora of resources. And then there are some who believe it is good to opt for the traditional way. But, according to me, it is the good old books that makes children better. Though they may lack the latest information, no one can deny the fact that they have again and again proven to be correct in nature.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 277, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...because of this, it should be followed. Whereas, other opine that it is better to go wi...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 486, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
... the methodology these online platforms use to teach is tremendous in nature. One s...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, then, well, whereas, in general, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 13.1623246493 228% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 48.0 24.0651302605 199% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2320.0 1615.20841683 144% => OK
No of words: 462.0 315.596192385 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02164502165 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63618218583 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7353458811 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530303030303 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 722.7 506.74238477 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0164629116 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.454545455 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.86363636364 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135363669928 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.038065513274 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387124532382 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0855182429529 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242826630122 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.