Some people believe that in order to give opportunities to new generation companies should encourage high level employees who are older than 55 to retire. Do you agree or disagree? Why?
Setting an age for retirement, at 55, has been a controversial decision for modern enterprises. Many believe younger generations should be provided with the opportunity to advance in their career with employees retiring at 55 years old. My opinions lean towards the disagreement of such enforcement.
There are advantages and disadvantages with such implementation. New generations have the capability to bring innovative ideas to the company, bearing the level of authority to form changes could lead the company a whole new level. The success of such would uplift the self-esteem and independence. Notwithstanding this, motivation is driven out, from the new generations, by aiming to advance in their career. On the other hand, eradicate elder employees would not be beneficial to the company when younger members are not ready to step into the roles, it could diminish the confidence in that person.
Senior staffs have wealth of knowledge and experience, both soft-skills and technical skills, through hand-on practices and these have unimaginable impacts when company is at risk. Company typically would experience cycles of culture changes and experience from senior members would provide guidance to avoid unnecessary industrial relations. Technology advancement nowadays leads to growing populations of over 55 and living longer, up to 80 or 90 years old, demonstrating the elders are capable in working for a while longer. By removing them from their jobs could change the mental status of elders, which could bring negative impact to the society.
Instead of imposing strict retirement at 55, senior staffs should be offered to extend their service until its deemed appropriate for younger generations to be promoted to ensure a sustainable future for the company. Further, I believe providing the role of mentors or advisor to young leaders, providing guidance, would assist the growth of the company.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 301, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s the disagreement of such enforcement. There are advantages and disadvantages w...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 605, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...diminish the confidence in that person. Senior staffs have wealth of knowledge a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, as to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1626.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47474747475 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00446900409 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616161616162 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7072156579 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.142857143 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.78571428571 7.06120827912 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128949602764 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0403469528109 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494622987538 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0826924017361 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369096646792 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.