Employers should focus on personal qualities over qualifications and experience when choosing someone for a job. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It has always been a controversial topic as to whether characteristics are more important than the level of education they received when seeking a new role. In this short essay, I will discuss my point of view on this matter.
Depending on the job profile, qualification is vital in compare to personal qualities. As an example, professional such as doctors require to be highly educated to perform a consultation and evaluate the best medication to cure a patient. Their individual distinctive will be a supplementing factor when the general public is defining a good doctor. Therefore, for professionals, employers may focus on education level rather than character. However, with more students gaining higher educations and certifications, it has become challenging for a company to pursue the best people based on skillsets.
Company culture has become increasingly important for the success of a corporation. Employees with an understanding of the vision and culture of the company, and having the aligned personal qualities will look to grow with the company. Understanding individual applicants’ characteristic provides an initial view on whether he or she will fit into the team environment and assess the suitability. As an example, a number of leading global consultancy firms requires candidates to conduct an online self-characteristic assessment prior to earning an interview opportunity.
Although qualification has always been a key factor for employers to hire a new starter, ones’ personal values would also be judged to allow the hirer to evaluate a candidate. Different job profiles also require a dissimilar method to appraise an applicant, I would believe both personal qualities and qualifications are equally imperative to a manager.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...t has always been a controversial topic as to whether characteristics are more important than...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...will be a supplementing factor when the general public is defining a good doctor. Therefore, f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 603, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sue the best people based on skillsets. Company culture has become increasingly ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, as to, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58671586716 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.48201861613 2.80592935109 124% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594095940959 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1179372891 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.461538462 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8461538462 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.53846153846 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139832081909 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0518900403204 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498089533846 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0827154779442 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546559130276 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.28 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.