Some people think that keeping pets is good for children while others think it is dangerous and unhealthy. Which opinion do you agree with? Discuss both options and give examples
There are many debates nowadays whether keeping pets in a household could bring benefits or drawbacks to children. In this short essay, I shall present the advantage and disadvantage and offer arguments on keeping pets would endanger children’s well-being are an over-emphasis constitution.
There are a variety of pets, these includes exotic and small animals. In no doubt, exotic animals such as snakes and reptile pets, would pose danger to children as they could not be tamed. Here, I would focus more on animals such as dogs, cats, rodents and rabbits as pets. Unlike human, the level of cleanliness maintained by pets could not be comparable. Negligence of owner providing preventive measure on pests and parasites is one of the key factors causing sickness in children. Rodents and rabbits could also harm children. There have been many newspaper articles discussing children bit by rodents and deadly diseases transferred to the children causing their death. However, I strongly believe all these could be avoided with a well responsible parent owner. There has been no research conducted to show having pets could present any physical danger to children.
In contrast, studies’ results demonstrated having pets in the household can have positive impact to children psychology. Children living in a household with pets have been known to be friendlier, caring, healthy and independent. This is because young pet owners would aid their parents with range of actions to maintain the pet’s well-being (e.g. walking the dog and grooming). Further, pets keep their young pet owners companion. Hospital, nowadays, has pet-doctors to help with curing children with adverse disease. Consequently, it is undeniable that pets could improve children’s social behaviour.
In conclusion, I believe the benefits of keeping pets would outrage the disadvantages. However, laws should be introduced to restrict the ownership of exotic animals to reduce danger poses on children.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 422, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'owners'' or 'owner's'?
Suggestion: owners'; owner's
...ing. Further, pets keep their young pet owners companion. Hospital, nowadays, has pet-...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, e.g., however, so, well, in conclusion, in contrast, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1692.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51140065147 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93379215611 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563517915309 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6212207669 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0526315789 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1578947368 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73684210526 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165611151983 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618365443712 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0336037089937 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112624037355 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0246845934104 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.