Some people believe that parents should be held legally responsible for their children's acts.
Do you agree or disagree?
A group of individuals conceive a notion that as parents are duty bound to take care of their wards, they must be held accountable for their children's deeds. If asked, I would raise my voice in favour of such opinion. My stance is eluciated in ensuing paragraphs.
Pondering the light on my view, the foremost argument is that children learn almost all life skills from their parents. As an immature, child's mind is molded by the moral values imparted by his parents hence his acts are a manifestation of his learning. This implies that the wrong doing is because the elderes did not provide appropriate guidance. To exemplify, if a chils is not told about the importance of cleanliness by his parents, he may throw rubbish everywhere.
Another factor that justifies my position is that parents have the ability to control their offspring's activities. Parents can prohibit their children from indulging in illegal acts and if they turn a blind eye, they out to be taken to task. For example, a person should be penalized if he allows his underage son to drive a car.
On the cotrary, a few others are of the opposite opinion. To begin with, they claim that each individual is free to do whataver they want to do. A mother or father can not monitor all acts of their wards 24*7 as there are times when a child is independent to do things as per his wishes. For example, a boy may get into a fight with his friends at a playground where the parents have no control over him.
In the end, I pen down by commenting that, as parents bring their children into this world, it is their moral as well as social responsibility to make sure that the children adhere to the laws of the land. This can reduce juvenile crime to a large extent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 12, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...have no control over him. In the end, I pen down by commenting that, as parent...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, may, so, well, for example, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56549520767 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55931881382 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584664536741 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8740205109 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3125 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5625 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261857908675 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703260626949 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660269921978 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143672318465 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428378871236 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 12.4159519038 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.