Science tell us the activites which aware good for our health and which are bad. Millions of people all over the world know this and still do unhealthy activities.
Why do you think this is and what can be done to change this.
Scientific research has clearly bifurcate the deeds which are beneficial as well as detrimental to human's health. However, inspite of aware this fact, a vast majority of individuals are indulge into activites which are not beneficial for their health. There could be a myraid of reasons for that but at the same time few remedies can be implemented to mitiage this issue. My perception is elucidated in ensuing paragraphs.
Pondering the light on issue, the foremost one is that it is because of hectic schedule. In contemporary time, the life has become so busy due to heavy work pressure. Therefore, people are not able to manage their diet properly as we ll as not able to do physical activities to them themselves fit. For example, a person living in Mumbai city has to spend a lot of time in commuting for reaching their office which compel them to eat more ready to eat food which in turn makes them unhealthy.
On the contrary, some steps must be implemented to mitiage these predicaments. To begin with, more awareness compaign should be spread depicting disadvantage of unhealth food. Public may become more alert towards their diet and may change their diet from junk food to balance food. Moreover, company must also play a crucial role. Organisations must organize fitness camp on frequent basis in order to make their employees fit & healthy. The other thing can be done is to arrange the indoor sport events like table tennis in company campus.
In the end, I pen down by commenting that inspite of having knowledge about unhealthy activies, people are still indulging themselves into that due to their busy & stressful life. However, peoper measures can be taken like creating awareness compaign as well as corporate initiative may ameliorate the situation unto major extent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 33, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'bifurcated'.
Suggestion: bifurcated
Scientific research has clearly bifurcate the deeds which are beneficial as well ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'indulged'.
Suggestion: indulged
...act, a vast majority of individuals are indulge into activites which are not beneficial...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, as to, for example, as well as, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01337792642 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67815302303 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625418060201 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4041558722 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6875 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6875 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0625 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200693848864 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0539272080366 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575938122418 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115879978269 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0698835582099 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.