Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful, others disagree. Discuss both the views and give your own opinion.
It has been observed that many times organizations demand confidential details of job seekers like their marital status, hobbies, location, language preference etcetera. A group of individuals concieve a notion that these data are vital for employer swhile a few others are against such phenomenon. Therefore, both aspected ought to be discussed first before giving my opinion.
Pondering the light on formerview, the foremost argument put forward by the proponents is that, sensetive informations are important for screening the job applicants. Analysing their data will give vivid picture of their behavour, adaptibility for profile and preference of candidate before the interview. To exemplify my point, if vacant position is into the field of sales and marketing were extensive travelling is need of the job but if person is not comfortable with hectic travelling then it is better not to call the person for interview hence saves a lot of efforts as well time of employer.
Expounding the flip side, the primary reason put forth by others is that shortlisting of curriculum vitae should be based on candidates professional skills. There is a possibility that company might loose potential candidate based on evaluation of his personal data. For example, if a person is staying in far province and HR professional might think that person may not relocate with his family hence he may not call for the interview even though he has valid talend and work experience to perform the job. In addition to this, there is no reliablity of details provided by applicants. Many times it happen that, candidate submit the fake details to impress the employer.
In the end to summarize and recapitulate, there is conspicuous form the aforesaid deliberation that personal details will help to screen the candidate profile on some parameters but more emphasis should be given to candidate's professional skills & work experience.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 200, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...ere is a possibility that company might loose potential candidate based on evaluation...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 602, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'happens'?
Suggestion: happens
...s provided by applicants. Many times it happen that, candidate submit the fake details...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, may, so, then, therefore, well, while, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1621.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29738562092 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96239342581 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591503267974 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.6411436501 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.083333333 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200778010772 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656920615639 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397633760203 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112505981972 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387862482592 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.