There are split opinions over ways of controlling air pollution. A group of individuals conceive a notion that worldwide car free days are more impactul remedy for improving air quality while others are in opinion that there are many other options available to tackle this issue. Therefore, ahead of my position both the aspects ought to be discussed.
Pondering the light on former view, the foremost argument put forward by proponents is that restricting usage of car on certain days will bring down toxic particles in the air. Majority of cars are still using Fossil Fuel as a feedstock which results into omission of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases which are responsible for deteriorating air. For example, investigation was carried out in global top 5 metro cities & it was found that more than 25% of air pollution is contributed by vehicles, especially by Cars. Besides this, people will opt to commute by public transportation rather than private vehicles. Therefore, this will result into reduction of less fuel consumption & subsequently will lower the harmful gases to environment.
Expounding the later view, there are a plethora of approaches to curb the substandard air quality. To begin with, all the countries should bring stringent norms to reduce the pollution from the factories as well from the power plants. Globally all the countries are in competition for increasing their Gross Domestic Production (GDP) and so rapid Industrialization which is causing more air pollution than car. The other solution, especially developing nations should come together to invest more in renewable source of energy. Growing nations are generating more than 60% of their electricity from Thermal power plant which contributes significantly to the pollution. Therefore, such nations should allocate more funds for power generation through non-conventional source of energy like wind, hydro or solar. To, exemplify my point, India has set the target to generate more than 70% of utility from other than thermal plant by 2030.
To summarize & give my opinion, it is quite clear from above deliberation that car free days will defiantly improve the air quality in short term but stricter guidelines for Industrialization as well investing more in renewable source of energy will reduce the air pollution significant in long term.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 27, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ironment. Expounding the later view, there are a plethora of approaches to c...
^^
Line 5, column 40, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Expounding the later view, there are a plethora of approaches to curb the subst...
^^
Line 5, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ra of approaches to curb the substandard air quality. To begin with, all the coun...
^^
Line 5, column 569, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ating more than 60% of their electricity from Thermal power plant which contribut...
^^
Line 7, column 302, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...air pollution significant in long term.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, in short, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1947.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33424657534 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96423302026 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580821917808 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 604.8 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9122848196 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.6875 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8125 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5625 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200588318147 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650564699639 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054939479128 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138874361264 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590683205096 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.