It is argued by some that radio is an ideal way to get information on what is happening around the world, while others believe that television is much more appealing to gain knowledge. In my opinion, it is better to get information through television and in this essay I will state the reasons for holding to my view.
The most compelling reason for holding to my view is that television has visual effects. If a person is able to hear and see the news at the same time, there are higher chances of them understanding it correctly. Also, there is a powerful impact on the person receiving the information. For instance, any news on natural calamities like earthquake and floods that are shown on TV from the various parts of the world will have a deeper impact on the person. Moreover, they are able to relate to the situation even better. Therefore, most of the people rely on TV channels like BBC, CNA to get information frequently.
Another reason is that due to technological advancements, people are more likely to believe what they see, pictures and other powerful tools enhance the information that is disseminated. Lastly, we see all around the world TV and other social media is readily and easily available to the public. Even restaurants, pubs, hotels have installed TV to entertain their guests and clients. Hence, I strongly believe that information via TV is more convincing to people.
Despite the above arguments, there are some people who feel that listening to news is an ideal means especially on the go. Like, while commuting from one place to another you tend to switch on the radio of a car or in a public bus normally you may listen to podcasts. But, this number is generally very low in comparison to TV viewers.
In conclusion, while both views are commonly held in society. I completely agree that TV is the best way to cascade news down to people around the world. Given this situation, people around the world could use either means depending on their convenience, however it is more appropriate and appealing if they would see the news themselves.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 454, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'peopling'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'convince' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: peopling
...t information via TV is more convincing to people. Despite the above arguments, there ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, lastly, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1732.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79778393352 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73027631005 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523545706371 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3428467001 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2222222222 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0555555556 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299818788818 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843808913024 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521064430099 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161215983623 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551021940604 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.