Some people believe the range of technology available to individuals today is increasing the gap between poor people and rich people. Others think it is having an opposite effect. Discuss these points of views. What is your opinion
It is well known fact that technology is growing exponentially during these days. Some people argued that technology is one of the factor for creating differences between the poor and rich people. However, it is advocated by some that we have better life because of the advancements created by science. This essay will analyse both sides and explain why technology is solely responsible for making the gap more wider among different sectors of people.
One one hand, technology has given us many benefits such as mobile phones, Internet, etc. We have now better techniques which can provide future predictions of weather responsible for the farming in most of the rural areas of any country. For example, there is growth in the production of crops after India has launched the satellite for the analysis and prediction of climate for different regions of country. After the invention of internet and mobile phones, people of rural area's becomes the part of global village and hence they have strong means of communication with rest of world.
On other hand, it is believed by many that science is the major factor multiplying the gap between poor and rich people. All the greatest inventions of science, can be acquired by the money. Science has gifted us the power to build better houses with better facilitation which can be owned by the people with good financial status. Internet, which has made the whole world a small place, is not in the reach of many people across the world. For example, about 40 percent of people , don't have access to internet because they can not afford it.
To conclude, despite the fact that we are living comfortable and better life because of the inventions happening rapidly these days, I still advocate that technologies are highlighting the financial aspects of individual's.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 407, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'wider' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: wider
...s solely responsible for making the gap more wider among different sectors of people. O...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: One
...r among different sectors of people. One one hand, technology has given us many bene...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 103, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'bettered', 'welled'.
Suggestion: bettered; welled
...bile phones, Internet, etc. We have now better techniques which can provide future pre...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 481, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... For example, about 40 percent of people , dont have access to internet because th...
^^
Line 5, column 484, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...r example, about 40 percent of people , dont have access to internet because they ca...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, so, still, well, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1517.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02317880795 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62236507202 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543046357616 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.625215855 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.357142857 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07142857143 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188181392932 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713533886751 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739239904585 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113250319561 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0702409719882 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.