Some people believe that students should be allowed to evaluate and criticize their teachers to improve the quality of education. Others think this is disrespectful to teachers. Discuss both views, give your opinion and include relevant examples.
No one would deny the importance of improving the quality of education. In order to achieve this, some people think that students should be allowed giving evaluation and feedbacks about their teachers, while others believe that this is not respectful to teachers. In this essay I will dosicuss both arguments and give my support to the former.
On the one hand, it is claimed that allowing students to evaluate their teachers may result in disrespecting. this is because it allows students to give personal opinions about teachers; hence, not only showing their professional vulnerabilities but also commenting on their characters. In contrast, it will result in more prestigious image of teachers if students where not be allowed to evaluate them.
On the other hand, I believe that students should be allowed to evaluate their teachers in order to receive the best educational services. In other words, if you can measure the quality of teacher's work, you can manage obtaining better education. For example, this can be beneficial in a high school. When students can evaluate in details how a teacher demonstrate his subject's information, the school will easily assess the skills of it's stuff teachers. Thus will be able to overcome and solve any educational errors. Additionally, to overcome the disadvantages of such process, the evaluation can be done privately.
In conclusion, according to the probability of disrespecting teachers, some people argue that students should not be allowed to evaluate their teachers. while because of the professional benefits of assessing teachers by students, I think it is a needed process that should be applied soon in all schools.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 111, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...r teachers may result in disrespecting. this is because it allows students to give p...
^^^^
Line 9, column 456, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ssess the skills of its stuff teachers. Thus will be able to overcome and solve any ...
^^^^
Line 13, column 154, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
... be allowed to evaluate their teachers. while because of the professional benefits of...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, so, thus, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, in contrast, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1425.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3171641791 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97044924608 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518656716418 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5876257106 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.785714286 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07142857143 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.482003994306 0.244688304435 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164569925544 0.084324248473 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114574695996 0.0667982634062 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.313804808025 0.151304729494 207% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0762061956583 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.