Some people believe that unpaid community service be made a compulsory part of high school programmes (like working of a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children) upto what extent do you agree or disagree?
In swiftly growing materialism’s era humanity is mutating into inconsideration, self-obsession along with miserliness. In all these, several mortals adage that volunteer social welfare services ought to be introduced at utmost concern for higher secondary classes. I completely affirm this practice because to curb the ailment of society, efforts should be initiated from younger age.
Firstly, so pestilential and prevalent are the antisocial activities like drug addiction, burglary ete cetera that they are distracting youngsters from the path of their set goals while unpaid welfare service could be considered as path guide for such diverted adolescents. Illustrating this, government of India has proposed a project “Make in India” to indulge youth students to retain young age from objectionable and unlawful bustles. Secondly, not only do volunteer supporting services instill prosperity, solicitous and many other social traits, but also indoctrinate the individual requisite characteristics such as responsibility and liability. Hence an individual becomes socially and personally balanced personality with the aid of honorary help for others.
Furthermore, comprehensive furtherance of a youngster is not only confined up to academic or sports achievements, one should be patient, forbearing, flexible and adjusting and all these prowess are flawlessly nurtured through serving for others without any avarice. Furthermore, I personally think that assisting needy via any help is a feel of peculiar accomplishment and satisfaction which cannot be replace by any triumph. For example, in sikh religion generally people serve meals termed as “Langar” in sikh temples called “Gurudwara Sahib” voluntarily, that sort of satisfaction and intellectual peace can never be earned through any victories. In addition to this, being helping hand for other is a fate of receiving the same through several other ways.
Recapitulating the above discussion, god has presented a beautiful life to human beings. One can synergy the aesthetics of this by assisting other through distinct ways like compassion, environment sheltering as well as through teaching and high school is the perfect age to inculcate these well etiquettes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 147, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'mortals'' or 'mortal's'?
Suggestion: mortals'; mortal's
...with miserliness. In all these, several mortals adage that volunteer social welfare ser...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 663, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...s such as responsibility and liability. Hence an individual becomes socially and pers...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 181, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this prowess' or 'these prowesses'?
Suggestion: this prowess; these prowesses
...bearing, flexible and adjusting and all these prowess are flawlessly nurtured through serving...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Two successive sentences begin with the same adverb. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...serving for others without any avarice. Furthermore, I personally think that assisting need...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 308, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...age to inculcate these well etiquettes.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, for example, in addition, sort of, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1936.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.90243902439 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40959994757 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.676829268293 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 612.9 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.8814931898 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.923076923 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2307692308 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3076923077 7.06120827912 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0940780344527 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0301676840929 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0248507361771 0.0667982634062 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0566831173974 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00610174877158 0.056905535591 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.0946893788 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.72 50.2224549098 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.24 12.4159519038 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.89 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.