Travelling has become easier these days than it was in the past. Thanks to some outstanding technological improvements, like airplanes or bullet-trains it is now possible to reach far locations and continents in a matter of hours. Countries that once seemed to be inaccessible lay close at hand. It is no surprise therefore that some people express concerns when it comes to opening countries to masses of tourist. Although tourism represents a huge source of income for many countries, many believe that visitors should conform to the local traditions. In this essay I will examine this issue and explaining why I think tourists should respect local traditions but cannot forced to follow them.
For many nations in the world, tourism is one of the few, if not the only source of revenue. Chiefly located in far-flung parts of the planet, those countries lack of industries and a stable economy but can offer breathtaking pieces of nature: white strands, deep blue oceans, lush forests and sunny days. Traditions play still today a major role and local people are usually very proud of it, so that tourists are often invited to take part in indigenous ceremonies. I think, this approach is right. After all, visitors have the possibility to make acquaintance with remote cultures that otherwise would have remained unknown. Furthermore, visitors during a trip should not pass up the opportunity to taste foreing foods, to admire weird architecture or to try to speak a new language.
On the other side, many believe that visitors should not be follow local customs. I would lean to this position because visitors do not come to a foreing land to be active part of it, to serve it or to become citizen of it. In many cases tourists want to visit a foreing land just because they thirst for the unknown. Visitors bring money and help to sustain the local economy, which consequently has a positive effect on the whole community. Tourists have the duty to respect the local population, its traditions, customs and religion, however weird they could appear to foreing eyes. I do not support the idea that visitors should align with local customs. In some countries is commonplace for example to eat insects or snakes. In others cruel religious rituals or festivals where animals are exploited, continue to survive. In these cases, visitors have the right to say no and to refuse to do something they believe it can be dangerous or outragerous.
Summing up, it is possible to me to merge the two different points of view. On the one hand, tourist must respect local traditions and the environment. On the other one, though, they must also be free to maintain their identity and to refuse to do something they believe it is wrong or unsafe for them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 828, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...als are exploited, continue to survive. In these cases, visitors have the right to...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, so, still, therefore, after all, for example, i think, in many cases, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2287.0 1615.20841683 142% => OK
No of words: 467.0 315.596192385 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89721627409 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6864284261 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 176.041082164 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546038543897 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 717.3 506.74238477 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.76152304609 252% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6885775723 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2916666667 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4583333333 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54166666667 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256947450074 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675508241502 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058531888091 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147040445213 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523562991348 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.