Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behaviour. Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences.
In this modern era, there is an ongoing deliberation among people on respecting cultural differences. While some people argue that, the visitors to a country should follow local customs but the other argue that the host country should welcome cultural differences of their visitors. On my point of view, the visitors need to adopt to the local customs of the country they live.
First and foremost, the visitors to a specific country should adapt to the local culture such as food habits and their religious beliefs as well. For instance, Sri Lankan Muslims who were originated from Saudi Arabia refused to get adopted on Sri Lankan culture. Therefore, the trust among the other communities have been deteriorated over the time. This scenario has adversely affected on Sri Lankan economy together with the political stability as well. The minority population have to respect to other culture prevailing in the country, and the majority community should also have to facilitate minority community to follow their cultural and religious practices inside the legal and constitutional frame work.
On the other hand, some people argue that host country has to welcome cultural differences of their visitors. For example, governments should ensure human rights of their visitors such as food, shelter, educational and medical requirements. But, governments should not allow them to deviate from the common law of the country.
In conclusion, governments need to impose laws to ensure secure safe environment for all the religions and ethnicities, while each visitor need to respect the culture and the law framework of the respective country as well. Cultural differences add colours to the society, because there will be lot of different cultural and religious events celebrated within a single country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 326, Rule ID: ADOPT_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'adapt to'?
Suggestion: adapt to
... my point of view, the visitors need to adopt to the local customs of the country they l...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37676056338 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73381651316 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521126760563 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6737604089 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.461538462 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8461538462 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61538461538 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405356889549 0.244688304435 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145807980325 0.084324248473 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15312903925 0.0667982634062 229% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.270460206702 0.151304729494 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.165071103034 0.056905535591 290% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.