In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there.
What is your opinion about this?
In this modern era, there is an ongoing deliberation among people on building homes in the countryside. While some people argue that advantages of building houses in countryside overweigh the disadvantages, on my point of view, I strongly reject that statement. In this essay, I shall discuss on factors strengthening my argument while analyzing both sides of it.
First and foremost, there are myriad of disadvantages in building houses in countryside such as deforestration, inconvenience and insecurity. For instance, if people start to shift to countryside due to scarcity of land in city area, a large area of forests needs to be cut down to provide space for housing projects. If, people who used to city culture shift to countryside, they will face immence difficulties in satisfying their needs and wants with less effort, because there would be less availability of infrastructure.
On the other hand, some argue that building houses in countryside is the optimal solution for providing shelter to the growing population. For example, if there is no suitable land for housing projects people have to shift to countryside irrespective their preference of living in cities. However, this option is viable for people who are enagaged in agricultural activities since thet can buy land at much cheaper price, together with other resources such as irrigation and man power. Moreover, old people who wants to live in a peaceful environment can build houses in countryside.
In conclusion, it is recommended to build apartments in city areas to take the maximum benefit out of land while facilitating the people who are employed in city limits. This would mitigate deforestration and also the negative impacts on wild life and biodiversity. Governments, even can use countryside for tourist attraction and generate lucrative contribution to the national income. Finally, governments even can improve the infrastructure of the suburbs, to mitigate the trend in moving to countryside.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 332, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...wever, this option is viable for people who are enagaged in agricultural activities sin...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, so, then, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1683.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37699680511 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20913437188 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562300319489 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4818148306 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.214285714 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3571428571 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1428571429 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226341159398 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0826538678936 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524674348241 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139818285759 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399152430095 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.