Some people claim that public museums and art galleries are not needed because people can see historical objects and works of art using a computer. Do you agree with this opinion?
People are calling into question the usefulness of having museums. While some advocate the idea that the museums and art galleries are essential for visiting historical objects, others dismiss them as it can be seen on computers. Admittedly, I believe that the elimination of these places would have serious repercussions for the society owing to a number of compelling reasons.
To being with, the most rational justification is that these places are also a place for gathering more information. In other words, there are not only for keeping the historical objects but also a place to get more unique information about art works. That is to say, there are a lot of experts who dedicate their lives learning and studying these works, and by talking to them, ones can gain more knowledge about the artworks. The more people visiting these places and discussing about arts with experts, the more they learn. This in turn would have a far-reaching positive impact on society as individuals are likely to have more respect for artworks and artist as a whole.
Yet another compelling argument against watching these objects and works through computers is the nature of some artworks and historical objects. To put it differently, being unique and special, some artworks and historical objects cannot be seen on the screen. That is, by only seeing it in person, individuals will realize the uniqueness of that piece of work. Take the last supper paint as an example; if people only can see this through the screen, they cannot realize the details of this work or how hard would it be to drawn a piece of art in large format size.
To sum up, considering the points discussed above, the most rational conclusion to be drawn is that the elimination of museums and galleries can easily take its toll on society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 4, Rule ID: BEING_BEGIN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'begin'?
Suggestion: begin
...o a number of compelling reasons. To being with, the most rational justification i...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, in other words, to sum up, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93137254902 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6315063978 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5063016365 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.076923077 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5384615385 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15384615385 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241417831351 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0869087237109 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588744482186 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14010155969 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553114522767 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.