People, in general, spend their free-time in engaging themselves in things that they like, such as watching a movie, playing a sport, pursuing their personal interests, like photography or involving in some volunteering activities. Few generally does not bother about spending such time with their co-workers, whereas others would like to have their personal side away from the work professional life, instead. In my opinion, it is always better to distance the private life from the work-life. In this essay, I will analyse both views and gives reasons for my opinion.
Some people say that spending more time with fellow staffs provide an opportunity to understand them and to develop a good rapport with them. For example, when employees watch a football match or movies together, they feel more connected to each other. This is because by doing this, they not only share common likes and dislikes, but it also allows them to share their point of views on different subjects. However, in my view, people, in general, spend most part of their time at the workplace, hence, passing free-time as well in the similar circumstance will have a diverse impact on their personal life.
Admittedly, using free-time for engaging in activities like reading books, learning photography etc will aid mankind to evolve in life. For example, time spent in reading useful texts will improve a person's knowledge in some way or the other. Furthermore, spending time on such extracurricular activities will help people to think innovatively and allow them to deviate their thoughts from office and home stress.
In conclusion, though pass-time spent with co-workers allows one to mingle with others in a better way, using such time for pursuing their area of personal interest like reading, learning new art forms or language will assist not only to acquire new skills but also help them to forget the stress that comes from workplace and personal life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 200, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... in reading useful texts will improve a persons knowledge in some way or the other. Fur...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, well, whereas, for example, in conclusion, in general, such as, in my opinion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1630.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14195583596 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61370126188 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567823343849 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.4676344147 49.4020404114 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.833333333 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4166666667 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4166666667 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345620266544 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134359655362 0.084324248473 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734178227528 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22211669863 0.151304729494 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0902083824578 0.056905535591 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.