Many companies around the world have their own Human Resource policies covering areas starting from recruitment, employee benefits and leave policies to retirement. Some people suggest that all workers must be given equal treatment and the holiday leaves for all categories of employees must be on par with the other. I tend to agree with their view and in this essay, I will discuss both views and emphasize why equality in treatment is very important.
People who criticize this view say that employees leave and other benefits should vary according to the hierarchy level of workers. For example, top-level employees should receive superior treatment and must be provided with more number of vacations a year. However, I believe such treatments will lead to discrimination on the part of the management. Furthermore, it will create unnecessary confrontations among the employees and may at times lead to labour issues.
Admittedly, many labour laws across the different countries not only prescribe rules for salary fixation but they also emphasize on fair treatment of employees in terms of paid vacations and other administrative benefits that offered to all the staffs. Firstly, such practices make all employees feel that they are treated in an equal manner and are respected without any bias. Such feel will improve their confidence in the management significantly that results in a better co-operation in work environment. It will also motivate them to create a friendly environment, thereby improving the harmony among the staff members.
In conclusion, a companies employee related policy that categorizes employees based on their cadre and fixing benefits such as vacation holidays in proportion to their superiority level will invite unwanted disputes between management and the labor union, eventually, disrupting the operations of the company. Thus, in my opinion, it is the responsibility of the management to draft and impose a policy that demonstrates fair treatment of all staff groups, like providing equal vacation leaves to everyone across the organization. Unless an entity treats all its employees at par, how can it create a better working place for them?
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 324, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an equal manner" with adverb for "equal"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ll employees feel that they are treated in an equal manner and are respected without any bias. Suc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 18, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'companies'' or 'company's'?
Suggestion: companies'; company's
... the staff members. In conclusion, a companies employee related policy that categorize...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1848.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40350877193 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93276457174 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56432748538 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.3853273163 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.0 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186917446468 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664051570188 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685158123024 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119369533774 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369136668704 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.