Some people feel that entertainers e g film stars pop musicians or sports stars are paid too much money Do you agree or disagree Which other types of jobs should be highly paid

With the rapid development of the economy, the life quality begins to get better and better. People are willing to spend money on entertainment. So, there are many different careers in entertainment. Some people argue that entertainers are paid too much money, such as film stars, pop musicians, etc.

Entertainment is important to our life and stress increases with the rapid pace of life. In order to relieve stress, entertainment is necessary for us. Actors, singers work to entertain the audience, and they need to spend a lot of time training their profession. For an instant, a singer needs to remember a lot of lyrics during a concert, and an actor needs to remember a variety of lines and actions. Therefore, some people think that the reward for having put in so much effort cannot be too small.

In my point of view, there is an old saying that goes, “one minute on the stage needs ten years practice off stage.” Imagine a performer who forgot the lyrics or the movements on stage because of insufficient preparation. The other performer is practising hard to be fluent and has superb performance. However, when two people are charged the same, doesn’t it seem unfair?

I believe that no one wants to see a failed performance with expensive money or just hanging in the name of an entertainer and charging costly for failing performances. The reward for the performer should be proportional to the effort. If the performer involved themselves wholeheartedly in performance, even if the ticket price is high, it is worth it for the audience.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...d money on entertainment. So, there are many different careers in entertainment. Some people a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, therefore, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1304.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93939393939 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91456043589 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609848484848 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.8254659914 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.9333333333 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 7.06120827912 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16962597949 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601549458445 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823211216055 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10080472 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652571556689 0.056905535591 115% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.