Some people feel that entertainers (e.g. film stars, pop musicians or sports stars) are paid too much money.
Do you agree or disagree?
Which other types of jobs should be highly paid?
The celebrities from various fields are earning enough money that their descendants do not need to worry about a livelihood. Many people are of the view that these stars are rewarded enormously for their performances while others dispute the view. In the ensuing writing, I will present my support for the former opinion.
The public performers including movie actors, singers, and soccer players can earn a fortune against a single performance. Furthermore, many fashion and business chains appoint them as their ambassadors to promote their brands and grant the exorbitant sums. The pay cheques for these famous personalities are based on their huge fan following and as a result, the sponsoring companies try to outbid each other by paying excessively. In addition to this, these people can also organize a one-off event and earn based on the number of attendees.
Conversely, the academic and labour-intensive jobs are not well paid. The foremost employment type which should be compensated handsomely is the teaching so that the literary & academic culture can be promoted. Even though being an athlete or a performer is the premium source of earning but not everybody can be a star. The commercial business should also come forward and highlight the achievements of other jobs as they do for the athletes. For instance, a famous Indian cricket star Virat Kohli gets millions of dollars annually in sponsorship for placing a sticker of a brand on to his bat.
To sum up, I strongly believe that there should be some equality in compensation for different sectors and popular stars enjoy preferential treatment in earnings. And other services like Teachers, Scientists, Doctors, Librarians, and Researchers should be acknowledged in the same spirit.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 137, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun fashion seems to be countable; consider using: 'many fashions'.
Suggestion: many fashions
...inst a single performance. Furthermore, many fashion and business chains appoint them as the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, furthermore, if, so, well, while, for instance, in addition, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27046263345 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94311073693 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640569395018 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.1436729396 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.785714286 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0714285714 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18146441579 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596823978243 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046190768189 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105404599001 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626459471686 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.