Some people prefer to live in a house, while others feel that there are more advantages
to living in an apartment.
Are there more advantages than disadvantages of living in a house compared with living
in an apartment?
A home is a place, where people live with gratification and contentment. The argument over whether residing in traditional house begets more benefits, or staying in a flat is better has not been settled yet. This essay will suggest that the major drawback of living in a house is alienation, which far outweighs the benefit of privacy it brings.
Admittedly, the basic benefit of living in a house is it does not allow anyone to intervene in the privacy of the residents. This is to say, in conventional houses people do not have to share facilities with others: gym, swimming pool, and car parking place. In contrast, individuals living in same building have all of these in common, which lack personal privacy and many people loathe to share. For example, a survey published in the Daily times stated that 60% of the people prioritize living in separate houses because in the apartments many people sneak in others' lives. However, living in houses has several repercussions which are unavoidable but the problem of having shared places could be overcome by the use of alternatives.
Despite the advantages above, the primary demerit is loneliness due to the lack of interaction between neighbors. In other words, people living in houses are not gregarious, they confined themselves to their homes. In comparison, residents of the apartments are company loving and magnanimous in nature and love to interact with each other on a daily basis due to having the same entrance, elevator, common theater, and other facilities. For example, neighbors of apartments keep in touch with each other so in time of need they are the first persons who could be reached instead of asking help from kith and kin who live far away and take a lot of time to reach.
To conclude, this essay argued that life in conventional houses is more serene and tranquil because of the privacy it provides. However, the major drawback of suffering from loneliness far outweighs any of the benefits it brings.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, for example, in contrast, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1664.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98203592814 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72755805619 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526946107784 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0461966539 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.857142857 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92857142857 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269429766008 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968706635205 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531471879617 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155715198339 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597035160934 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.