Some people say that in all level of education, from primary school to universities, too much time is spent in learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills
Do you agree or disagree?
Education is one of the leading pillar to achieve success in life. From basic to higher studies it contributes a lot towards building the career but unfortunately, it depends on cramming the facts instead of logical ideas. Some people agree with this view, I also support the statement keeping in mind the learning culture.
First of all, education criteria demand the pattern that enforce teachers and students to follow the instructions and considering merely the method to deliver knowledge. Although these are not futile efforts but these skills does not work in the long term as they are supposed to be mug and vomit after examinations. For grabbing opportunities in the competitive market and to remain in the race for long-duration gaining practical skills are indispensable. Because of ineffective learning criteria, students are deprived of many favourable chances, that might become an obstacle in progress.
Secondly, lack of appropriate resources like laboratory which can provide realistic outcomes forces the tutors describe the theory facts which might bore sometimes. For instance, my university labs were too small and equipment were also not enough in proportion to students. However, some schools and colleges adopting teaching pattern similar to the US as they provide only practical skills but it is not acceptable according to the universal system of India. Though it is a positive step towards development yet not welcomed by the existing one. Being practically helps to improve numerous skills like decision making, corporations, coordination, teamwork and patience. Therefore, it is quintessential to supply ample knowledge for accepting unfavourable situations.
To sum up, cramming do not reflect the skills of children it is a pragmatic technique which supports success. This essay argued why the existing system need to be modified in order to enrich performance. I believe, along with spending a plethora of time on learning facts practical exposure is equally important.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1707.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5064516129 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00036244775 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641935483871 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5796499943 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.6875 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3125 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157589639267 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.042392235195 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531157987147 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0892270442751 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309389159578 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.49 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.