Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills.
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in the number of people believing that majority of time is being spent on theoretical concepts instead of hands-on experience for learning, whether it is college or university. I completely agree with point of view; however, this essay would shed light on both sides in following sub-sections.
To commence with, there are deluge of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that education system emphasizes mainly on reading, writing and learning from college to tertiary education, which can only be memorized by the student’s mind for short period of time and when it is opportunity to apply those theories, they have forgotten them. Apart from this, educators encourage pupils to achieve good grades in order to get reputed job. As a result of this, they always after getting top scores in their exams. Moreover, there is no proper weightage for conceptual and practical subjects. To exemplify this, if there are give lectures for physics theory, then there will be just one or two labs for practicing the actual formulas of scientific theorems. Due to this, disciples are unable to perform well at their workplace because of less knowledge of actual world.
On the other hand, there are numerous benefits to acquire information of experiential notions along with remembering the written stuff. The primary one lies in the fact that learners broaden their horizons by learning the actual ideas of different subjects and enrich their knowledge. It helps to feel them more confident and enthusiastic. It cannot only help them to get excellent position in well established company, but also earn big money and live luxurious life. Thanks to the wide range of advantages it offers, youth can enhance the quality and productivity of young scholars with much ease, efficacy and convenience. For instance, the study results published by the government of Australia in March 2014 and April 2015 clearly indicate that students who have practical exposure of their studies to be taught in college or university have more memory to keep things in mind for longer period than those who just crammed the study material. Hence, it is proved that how much it is significant to give practical understanding to pupils.
To conclude, having pondered over above stated that it is crystal clear that giving just theoretical education is not enough for their bright future, practical knowledge has equal importance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 29, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'deluges'?
Suggestion: deluges
...ections. To commence with, there are deluge of arguments in favour of my stance. Th...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 228, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to tertiary education, which can only be memorized by the student’s mind for shor...
^^
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...morized by the student’s mind for short period of time and when it is opportunity to apply tho...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... knowledge has equal importance.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, then, thus, well, apart from, for instance, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2110.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 407.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18427518428 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73304389715 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 176.041082164 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616707616708 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 652.5 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.9165449642 49.4020404114 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.117647059 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9411764706 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138892406723 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0368247700972 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038565492317 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0776843146954 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0153166043439 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.