Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary school to universities, too much time spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills. Agree or disagree?
people often argue on how education system is focusing on theoratical knowledge instead of practical skills. I agree with the notion that unreasonable amount of time is occupied by bookish knowledge through academic institutes comparing to the lessons one learn involving real life skills. In this essay I will elaborate how academic classes and reading assessment steal the valuable time from learning anything practical.
First of all, from primary school to higher education, student spent at least 6 to 8 hours a day in the classroom in an average. To elaborate, the classroom basically follow a theoratical approach where the teacher give lecture in a myriad of topic. In most of the cases it remains verbal unless there is any scientific experiment. As a result, by the time someone complete higher education, although he has been going to school, he will only learn and memorise the concept due to lack of scope in practice based learning.
Secoundly, assignments related to reading and memorising require a huge amount of dedication. most of the academic body relies on exams and written assignments to assess student's academic condition, instead of conducting practical test. Undoubtedly, this represent over emphasy on learning facts and theories. If group or individual assignments related to a practical project was given priority, then it would allow the student to adopt practical knowledge. For instance, a recent survey has showed that people of Scandanevian country has ticked essay evaluation system as the key factor behind why student spend less time in outdoor activities.
To conclude, most of the people are allocating their time and effort in theoratical study in guidance of academic structure. However, employers always look at the number of professional experience and practiceal skill before hiring anyone. Therefore, everyone's duty is keep themselves rprepared with all the practical skills needed, like software application, accounting etc.
- Some people think that having people from different nationalities and cultural background living together in the same country makes the country develop faster. Do you agree? 78
- Write letter to along time colleague that you will not be able to attend his/her good bye party.-Why you will not be able to attend-How you enjoyed working with her/him-How you will keep contact with him/her 73
- Some people believe in the era of e-technology, printing newspaper and magazines will cease to occur in the near future. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people say that a person’s success depends on his/her upbringing by parents. Do you agree or disagree? 89
- First impressions are important. Some people think that doing well in interviews is the key to securing a good job.To what extent do you agree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
people often argue on how education system is ...
Line 1, column 263, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to involve'.
Suggestion: to involve
...utes comparing to the lessons one learn involving real life skills. In this essay I will ...
Line 5, column 95, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
...ng require a huge amount of dedication. most of the academic body relies on exams an...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, so, then, therefore, at least, for instance, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1675.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45602605863 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90920511713 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638436482085 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4716308482 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.666666667 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255713194446 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711674906587 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056105404687 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139071265042 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487495901089 0.056905535591 86% => OK
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.