Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills.
Do you agree or disagree?
It is believed by some that at different school levels, starting from primary education to the tertiary one, practical learning is less teached than studying information and facts in terms of the time. I agree with such opinion because, I think, practice is significant for job choice and for better understanding of the material.
First of all, including of more practical work into the educational process can help students choose their future work. Obviously, if person not only learns the information of the course, but also has a vast practical experience in it, it can provide them with valuable immersion into the positive and negative sides of the field. By doing so, they could decide whether the job suits them or not. For instance, be if the subject contains a lot of manual labor, some learners would decide that it is difficult for them and change their specialization.
Secondly, achieving more variety of practical skills, while studying any subject, is considered to be a crucial advantage in memorizing. In fact, many surveys have shown that when student combine brain activity with experiencing specialized practical work, they are able to remember information more accurately and precisely, moreover, the speed of memorization is higher. So that, such practice can benefit eventually students in terms of quality of education as well as the time they spent for learning.
In conclusion, I believe that more practical skills should be provided for students of various educational levels. This is advantageous either for career choice or for deeper realization of information and facts.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in fact, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1358.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28404669261 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88526057932 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626459143969 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9923252549 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.454545455 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3636363636 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5454545455 7.06120827912 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189285145707 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711795194525 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696317167191 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119773692729 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673421536827 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.