Some people say that children given pocket money every week will have lesser money problems when they become adults. Do you agree or disagree?
In this day and age, parents give allowances to children for their personal expenses in the form of money. While many people believe that children will have fewer financial problems in the future if their parents give them weekly pocket money, others oppose this notion. This essay will explain how I believe that weekly or monthly allowances are beneficial for children in the future with regard to cost management and financial skills.
To begin with, there are many benefits associated with the weekly pocket money. The most prominent one is that it equips them with cost management skills. This is because parents teach their children to use their money effectively and efficiently. Moreover, parents teach their children to save money for their future and spend it on useful products like laptop and books, which facilitate them to achieve their goal in the future. For instance, I bought my new laptop from my savings, when I was in my first year of college. I got extensive knowledge of my subjects from the internet that eventually helped me to get first position in my college. Thus, children who receive weekly allowance have higher chances to become a successful person in the future.
However, some children do not respect hard earned money when they receive it from their parents. This is because they take it for granted as they get it without any hard work and struggle. Besides, some children also waste their parent's money on illegal activities. For example, some youngsters from rich family waste their pocket money on drugs and gambling in Pakistan.
In conclusion, although some children do not respect their parent's hard earned money and waste it on illegal activities, I personally believe that there are several benefits of regular pocket money because it teaches essential skills of cost and risk management to youngsters. As a result, they have higher chances of career growth in the future.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, however, if, moreover, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 24.0651302605 191% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1604.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04402515723 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45710802581 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48427672956 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4819909588 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.25 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27862970068 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106304100826 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720687176226 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194128612736 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367004743052 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.