Although it is considered by some that children ought to take part in creating school’s limitations, others believe these are adults who are responsible for the whole education process. In my opinion, adults have a more holistic view and better realize the ultimate role of rules and, thus, should be leaders on this occasion.
On one hand, it is frequently deemed that in order for children follow the rules, they should be involved in their making. In other words, when children offer propositions which then become accepted by teachers and taken into account, youngsters feel proud as punch. As a result, not only do they obey the rules, but also urge other pupils to do the same. Moreover, there is a psychological trick which means that having invented rules, youths cannot rebel against them. For example, a principal of my daughters’ school reports that since students have been engaged in proposing restrictions and improvements, their behavior has been extremely enhanced.
On the other hand, only adults are liable for everything occurring in a school. This means they have to build all processes in such a way to guarantee a safe and encouraging educational environment. Furthermore, hardly do children have the ability to see as a big picture, as mature people and make decisions based on a holistic approach. Therefore, I do believe that teachers and other adults should take over rules-creating activities and urge adolescents to comply with them. For instance, it is obvious that children have a short attention span and while making up rules might focus on too few directions and, eventually, miss sufficient aspects.
In conclusion, while people can vary in their opinion, I am convinced that these are only adult people who ought to take leading roles in inventing school’s charters or regulations due to their ability to see more significant aspects and their responsibility for all students.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15705128205 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87064816563 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592948717949 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2659729902 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.769230769 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.4615384615 7.06120827912 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228353335044 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750034515824 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650705273522 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140791355897 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.071982928024 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.