Some people say economic development is necessary to reduce the poverty in the world. Others say that economic growth should be stop immediately to stop damaging the environment. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
It is irrefutable that the country's economy plays a vital role in various fields of development. In fact it also helps in bringing up the life status of poor people, which obviously eradicates poverty in the world. Nevertheless, some people think that boosting the economy will eventually affect the environment. Let me elucidate both sides of the argument. However, I wish to side with the former view.
On one hand, raising our economic trend will always aim at yielding more profit to the country. To attain this, various job opportunities are created all around the world which will employ millions of poor people. It is a win-win strategy where both the poor people and government gets benefited. Secondly, if the country has its good economical build up, they shall commence plethora of projects with the scope of providing basic needs to the needy people. With no doubt the below poverty line people would alleviate their status in the society. Thirdly, the country shall register themselves among the developed nations, if at all the poverty is dismissed from the grass root level.
On the other hand, the proponents suggest that it may lead to devastation in our ecology. This dilemma has been arised because economisation is directly proportional to population explosion, industrialisation, commercialisation, deforestation and ultimately extending the human territories. Furthermore, pollution level will attain its maximised level where the human living would be really a day dreaming.
I opine that certain measures should be taken in this regard. Perhaps, it is the combined role of both the government and citizens to mitigate this life threatening issues. Some hefty convictions shall be made against the legacy trespassers.
To put it in a nut shell I pen down stating that, country must excel in their economy to minimise the state of poverty without causing adverse effects to our ecosystem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 50, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in a nut shell I pen down stating that, country must excel in their economy to m...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, really, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, in fact, no doubt, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26384364821 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94976274926 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622149837134 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5024004776 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7777777778 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0555555556 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38888888889 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148844401813 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0427693287711 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0248248534995 0.0667982634062 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0703010443036 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396757166213 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.