Some people say economic development is necessary to reduce the poverty in the world. Others say that economic growth should be stop immediately to stop damaging the environment. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
In recent years, the rapid economic growth is gaining a great deal of attention around the world. Surprisingly, the role of economical growth has become a bone of contention among the critics owing to the development of environmental crisis along with positive contribution in curbing destitution. While some people consider deterring the growth of economy for subsiding the pollution, however, I would contend that it is a sine qua non for wiping out poverty.
On the one hand, it is inevitable that economical development is directly linked with the rapid industrialization. Owing to the rapid expansion in those segments, environmental pollution exceeds the tolerable limit and thereby starts creating expensive health hazards. Furthermore, gaining economical expansion results from the increased productivity in all sectors, including agriculture, power as well as wide range of industries. For this reason, a sudden spike appears in the extent of pollution resulted from increased use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides, presence of toxic fumes from the factories as well as burning fossil fuels for power generation. For instance, Bangladesh has gained a sustained economic growth in the last few decades compromising the quality of environment in a threatening level, reported in WHO bulletin this year.
Conversely, economical growth can be translated into increased per capita income. This means, undoubtedly, the people who are living even below the poverty line, are gaining financial freedom. Thus, the destitution issues are being resolved gradually and the livability index is being improved day by day. It is no surprise to see that the people of Bangladesh, for example, are earning more and spending more after the boom of industrialization in 2000.
All things considered, for protecting the environment, deterring the economical growth cannot be a proper approach. I personally believe, further in the future, the government should give more emphasis on economic freedom and expansion to sort out the destitution in a systematic method.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 125, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...nd the world. Surprisingly, the role of economical growth has become a bone of contention ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 40, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
... On the one hand, it is inevitable that economical development is directly linked with the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...ve health hazards. Furthermore, gaining economical expansion results from the increased pr...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 13, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
... WHO bulletin this year. Conversely, economical growth can be translated into increased...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 70, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...otecting the environment, deterring the economical growth cannot be a proper approach. I p...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, furthermore, however, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1754.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56825396825 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17853090357 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4047345217 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.285714286 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202106515345 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718278901037 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420040715061 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130600509958 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036333156196 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.