Some people say economic development is necessary to reduce the poverty in the world. Others say that economic growth should be stop immediately to stop damaging the environment. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Poverty is one of the major problems that the world is facing today. To decrease it, economic development seems the only way. While others would argue that economic development is harmful to the nature and it needs to stop, I believe it should not in order to help the humanity.
To begin with, developing the economy by establishing the industries, will help to counter the issue of poverty. It will create enormous amount of job opportunities for unemployed as well as poor people. Also government will have more money by taxes from these Industries. So it will be used to build houses and provide basic needs to poor people this way economic development can help to fight with poverty.
On the other hand, these Industries will increase the environmental issues. The exhaust gases from these Industries will create air pollution. In order to build more and more Industries, there will be need to cut down the trees. So the amount of Carbon Dioxide will also increase. As a result, it will lead to another major problem, global warming. Also chemical and other waste from these Industries will make water and land dirty.
But all these environmental problems can be controlled by successful efforts of the government such as making pollution related norms strict, shutting down only those Industries which are generating more pollution. Finding the effective way to use the alternative renewable energy sources in the industries by funding the research and development programmes. Thus, environmental issues connected to economic development can be reduced and we can use it to burn up the poverty.
To conclude, poverty can only reduced by economic growth. This creates some environmental problems but it can be solved by major steps of the government.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... for unemployed as well as poor people. Also government will have more money by taxe...
^^^^
Line 5, column 350, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... another major problem, global warming. Also chemical and other waste from these Ind...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, thus, well, while, such as, as a result, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11764705882 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80439527293 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.3037528561 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.1666666667 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0555555556 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183595341353 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0642232199678 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06605307861 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127317256924 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0742328993726 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.