It is a government’s responsibility to satisfy its citizens’ basic needs such as electricity, clean drinking water, freeway, and affordable housing. Some people think a high taxes is necessary. Nevertheless, others disagree, there is a controversial division about the high taxes.
Raising taxes to meet people's needs is a real thing that the government needs to consider. Due to a rapid increase in human population, serving everyone’s needs has become a challenging task and it requires tremendous resources. Since taxes are the only source of income for governments, there is no other way to fulfill people’s needs other than increasing taxes. For instance, People in the European country see taxes as an investment in their quality of life. Denmark has one of the highest tax rates in the world, the government makes the guarantee on education, healthcare and etc. The Danish think they are not paying taxes, they are investing in their society, and they are purchasing quality of life.
On the other hand, some people worry about that high taxes will probably kill entrepreneurship and investment. The political decision-makers should bear in mind that entrepreneurship is affected by fiscal policy. When taxes are high, there are fewer entrepreneurs, and fewer businesses are created, fewer investment, which means that less wealth is created. There are studies that show that high taxes reduce the funding available for business creation.
In conclusion, governments need to follow a combined strategy of raising tax ,they should not only fulfil the needs of the citizens but also consider the development of the country. They need the better public services ,and need the GDP as well. So, I think that the balance of taxes can lead to the circular flow of economy, lead to the greater communal facilities, and lead to happiness in the end.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 589, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
... the guarantee on education, healthcare and etc. The Danish think they are not paying ta...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 77, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ollow a combined strategy of raising tax ,they should not only fulfil the needs of...
^^
Line 7, column 219, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ry. They need the better public services ,and need the GDP as well. So, I think th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, nevertheless, so, well, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1582.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3265993266 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21123522217 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579124579125 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4854173394 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.875 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5625 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4375 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217355436687 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.080551470284 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690808019585 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131381406456 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270143980858 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.