Some people say that historical buildings should be knocked down, while others believe that they should be preserved and restored instead. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It has been a debatable issue from the last few decades that the historical structures should be demolished or conserved. A section of people believes that these are indispensable due to their ancient value, whilst others consider them useless. In my opinion, they should be restored because they are a great source of revenue and knowledge, However, I will discuss both sides of the argument in detail in subsequent paragraphs.
Old buildings are beneficial for society as a whole in many ways. At the first pace, they help the younger generation to understand, appreciate their culture, and tradition in a better way. Apart from that, they can not only use for government offices, tourist attractions, and hotels but also a good source of income generation. To illustrate, some historical building in Udaipur, Rajasthan is used as a hotel and tourist attraction. As a result, they are generating adequate revenue for the government. In Punjab, places of kings are being used as a municipal office.
On the other side of the argument, some people want to destroy traditional buildings completely because of multifarious reasons. Firstly, they believe that ancient structures are an obstacle in the progress of the country as they do not fit into the plan of modern cities. Having said that, as per data published by UNESCO, tourism is one of the booming industries and historical structures are one of the most visited places in the world. Apart from that, due to the increase in population and evolvement in technology, there is a great need for new housing. As a result, the masses demolished the traditional structure and construct new housing which is eco-friendly.
Having considered each side of the arguments, there is no doubt that modern buildings with the latest design are the need of the hour, but the old structure must be protected as they represent our heritage and earn income for the government.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, apart from, no doubt, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07570977918 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8818722443 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561514195584 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8847412825 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.266666667 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1333333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13333333333 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234830575756 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0712626635434 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638383160265 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142420549344 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0925734719742 0.056905535591 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.