Some people say it is important to keep your home and your workplace tidy, with everything organised and in the correct place.
What is your opinion about this?
It is widely argued that arranging everything properly in the right place in houses and work areas is a crucial step. In my opinion, items that we use occasionally can be kept in the right place;however, the things which we use often should he kept in an easily accessible place. This essay discusses on both the views.
On the one hand, placing the items in the right place can save time. If we misplace an item, we will end up spending most of our time searching it. Due to this reason, we fell frustrated and regretful that if I had placed the box in the correct place, I would have found it by now. Besides, having an organised work area provides us a peaceful state of mind rather than a messy table which makes us annoyed. For example, when we have an unorganised work area with everything scattered around, it can curb our concentration.
On the other hand, keeping the items, which we use often in the area that is easily accessible can be beneficial. Since reading books is one of the most common hobby among people, keeping books in a spot where we can take them easily helps us in completing the book. To elucidate, a survey conducted by a famous youtube star shows that about 75% of the people place the books on their table or anywhere it is easy for them to access. One other point worth considering is that it makes our lives more comfortable, when we are able to obtain it easily. Television remotes are extremely an useful product and usually keeping it on the sofa, instead of keeping it near the television facilitates us in watching the programmes, while resting on the sofa.
In conclusion, not everything ought to be kept in the right place. In my opinion, placing the things that are used often in a place which is easy to access makes our lives relaxed. Nonetheless, organising our workplace can provide us a calm atmosphere to carry our work without any distractions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 225, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'often' is usually put before the verb 'use'.
Suggestion: often use
...ight place;however, the things which we use often should he kept in an easily accessible ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 48, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'often' is usually put before the verb 'use'.
Suggestion: often use
...other hand, keeping the items, which we use often in the area that is easily accessible c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 585, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...asily. Television remotes are extremely an useful product and usually keeping it o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, nonetheless, so, while, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 24.0651302605 191% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1559.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58529411765 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62220356897 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520588235294 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6040954322 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4375 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128206033885 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490814378529 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0290451763621 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0884174822556 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0176888821937 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 12.4159519038 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.