Some people say it is manufactures and supermarkets responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of products they sell and others say it is the consumers responsibility to avoid buying products with too much packaging.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Buying and selling is our daily and necessary activities. Some product covered with excess wrapper while some items comes with little or no outbox. In recent times, a group of people claim that this packaging costs should go on them, who produce or sell the product. However, some others believe it’s customers choice whether to spend more for extra covering or not. Following paragraph will put some shed on both view and reach a conclusion.
To begin with, the main demand of a seller is to make profit no matter they are retailer or wholesaler. For precious or sensitive products like refrigerator, television etc. they spend a quite large amount for it’s safety which increase the price and ultimately general public pay for that. Producers or shopkeepers have to this otherwise it will cut off their profits. For example, a recent poll by Bangladesh government has found that entrepreneurs will lose 32% of their earnings if they take packing cost on their shoulder.
In contrast with above, end customers can also think indispensability of the item they are about to buy. If it cost really high, they should look for alternative things which are also available in the market. Moreover, necessity should be prioritise for such case where the product has made more attractive with excessive wrappings. For instance, an individual can buy a dinner set, which is heavily packaged, for safety or he/she can buy it in open form from other market at lower price.
To conclude, higher profit makes people greedy and thus brings negative effects on society. Additionally, depriving ourselves from acquiring some important things because of higher price is not positive vibe. So I feel authority should take actions to control unethical business and let the people live happily with their required commodities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'items'' or 'item's'?
Suggestion: items'; item's
... covered with excess wrapper while some items comes with little or no outbox. In rece...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 268, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...which increase the price and ultimately general public pay for that. Producers or shopkeepers ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...e packing cost on their shoulder. In contrast with above, end customers can also thin...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 240, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'prioritised'?
Suggestion: prioritised
...e market. Moreover, necessity should be prioritise for such case where the product has mad...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, moreover, really, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, i feel, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15488215488 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67332010158 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6632996633 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.2218871842 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.0588235294 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4705882353 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11764705882 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183698897786 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583103456402 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373301908667 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10982750336 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652496249749 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.