Some people say that it is possible to tell a lot about a person’s culture and character from their choice of clothes.Do you agree or disagree?
It is well known fact that dressing style of the people are greatly influenced by the climatic conditions in which they are surviving. It is argued by some that character and culture reflects from the style of clothes. However, there are counter arguments which abates the conclusion drawn by some. This passage will enlighten both perspective's and explains , why it is not relevant to judge individual values from his look and attire.
On one hand, It is advocated by many that type of clothes are greatly influenced by climatic conditions. For example, people who are residing in the northern part of world such as Canada, they prefer to wear warm clothes made up from animal's skin. However, people who resides in the hotter regions of world, they are restricted to the cotton clothes. It is also true that culture of an individual can mirrored by the attire. For example, a person from north India can be easily identified by the turban.
On other hand, It is not correct to draw conclusion about the characteristic's of an individual based on its wearings. Character of person sharpened by the conditions, in which one has survived his life. It is not wander that rich people can be involved in ransom by abducting some other people. For example, there is research which lighten the fact that most of the crimes happened with the power of rich people.
To conclude, despite of the fact that religion and culture can be illustrated by the wearings , It is not correct decision to draw the conclusion of values from the attire of an individual
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 358, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...enlighten both perspectives and explains , why it is not relevant to judge individ...
^^
Line 6, column 128, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ividual based on its wearings. Character of person sharpened by the conditions, i...
^^
Line 6, column 215, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'wandered'.
Suggestion: wandered
...ch one has survived his life. It is not wander that rich people can be involved in ran...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 94, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...lture can be illustrated by the wearings , It is not correct decision to draw the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, well, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1288.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84210526316 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63568101926 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 176.041082164 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496240601504 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 402.3 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1887767621 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92857142857 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165077737321 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0622482819664 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616501133816 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0984363487062 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322853627374 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.