Some people say that it is possible to tell a lot about a person's culture and character from their choice of clothes. 10.47
Do you agree or disagree?
It is opined by some people, that the cultural background and moral qualities of an individual can be determined by his or her attire. I strongly disagree with this belief because the changing fashion trends and intangibility of the character, are reasons to not to judge a person by the appearance.
First and foremost reason is that fashion keeps evolving. Nowadays, not only do people avoid wearing just one style of dress but also they keep upgrading clothes and accessories, as per the latest trends. Moreover, the monotony of wearing a culture inspired outfit has inspired people to try clothes from different cultures and regions. A great example to support this is that the wardrobes of people from the eastern part of the world are piled with western influenced outfits. It goes without saying that globalization has played a huge role in changing dress sense, therefore, a person's culture cannot be judged by their clothing.
Another point to consider is that the character is an inner quality. This intangible behavior should not be perceived by outer tangible clothes. There is ample evidence to suggest that a person's moral quality is influenced by the upbringing, education and the respect they pay to others and not by their outfit. For illustration, a beachwear endorsing model could also be a loyal wife, loving mother, and a caring daughter. Thus, making the perception of someone based on their choice of clothes is unfair.
To recapitulate, determining a person's background and values according to the apparel is not justified and consequently, the society should never judge a book by its cover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 186, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a person' or simply 'persons'?
Suggestion: a person; persons
...There is ample evidence to suggest that a persons moral quality is influenced by the upbr...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12977099237 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82583006231 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614503816794 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0577263186 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.384615385 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1538461538 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61538461538 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187813397671 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556559554501 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377595689297 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0920254356396 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429919614107 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.